The CNL Edge
Every management firm, agent, and agency on this page sees the same MMA metrics. CNL runs a different analysis. We map fighter audiences against brand spend in adjacent categories — categories nobody in combat sports thinks to look at. The gap we find is one other people miss entirely.
PULSE Precision needed a combat athlete with endurance and lifestyle credibility. CNL ran the audience map: Raul Rosas Jr. has a named fanbase and a border-corridor cultural identity that no supplement brand has touched. The deal architecture is built around equity participation, not a flat placement fee. That structure is what CNL proposes. The fighter earns permanently. That is the difference. (Deal architecture identified — pending partner review.)
20 years in the rooms where sport and luxury intersect. TKO, UFC, WWE, Floyd Mayweather, Richard Mille, Jacob & Co., Nitro Circus, Power Slap, SLS. The intelligence identifies the opportunity. Lionel opens the door. Most firms have one or the other. CNL has both.
CNL does not report the obvious. We do not point at stats everyone already has. We find the blindspot, assess the probability of success, and execute when the conditions are right. If the conditions are not right, we wait. That discipline is the moat.
What CNL builds
Five infrastructure pieces CNL builds around every client. No other firm builds all five. Most build one. The goal in every case is equity, recurring revenue, or ownership — not a one-time transaction fee.
Where deal structure allows, the athlete holds equity — not just a commission or an endorsement cheque. A business that earns permanently.
The most loyal fans pay for proximity. Monthly. Revenue that earns between events and after careers end. It compounds.
The right product, built with equity when the brand and structure allow it. Not every deal gets there. When it does, the athlete earns while they train.
Podcast, content, coaching, speaking. Built on who the athlete is. Earns between fights and long after the last one.
Built during the career — not after. Every player below manages the career. None of them build the structure that outlasts it.
This is not a competitor list. It is proof. Every category below shows the same gap — in every single row. That gap is CNL’s moat.
Expand any player to read the full profile and the real deal that proves their position. The capability tables stay open — they show where every other firm stops and where CNL starts.
Where deal structure allows, the athlete holds equity — not just a commission or an endorsement cheque. A business that earns permanently.
The most loyal fans pay for proximity. Monthly. Revenue that earns between events and after careers end. It compounds.
The right product, built with equity when the brand and structure allow it. Not every deal gets there. When it does, the athlete earns while they train.
Podcast, content, coaching, speaking. Built on who the athlete is. Earns between fights and long after the last one.
Built during the career — not after. Every player below manages the career. None of them build the structure that outlasts it.
Scroll to see 34 industry players mapped against these five pillars. The starred columns are empty everywhere except CNL.
These are the firms that close contracts and brand deals at the very top of the market. They are excellent at what they do — commission on a deal closed. None of them build the five things CNL builds. The biggest firm in the world signs an athlete, closes their contracts, sells their sponsorships, and ends the relationship at retirement. Nothing earns after that.
Represents 1,000+ athletes across every major sport. Sponsorship sales, contract negotiation, PR strategy, media rights. They are the largest pure-play sports agency on the planet. The model is commission on what they close. They do not build owned revenue infrastructure, inner circles, athlete-owned IP platforms, or post-career architecture.
Global athlete representation plus events and media rights. IMG operates across tennis, golf, football, fashion, and entertainment. Their advantage is cross-industry distribution: a tennis client can land a fashion campaign through IMG’s same building. They do not build owned channels, fan-direct revenue, or post-career IP for their athletes.
High-end talent contracts and brand crossover deals. CAA pairs sports clients with film, music, and luxury opportunities through the broader CAA roster. The strength is access to non-sport rooms. The gap is the same as the rest of this category: no owned revenue infrastructure, no inner circle membership architecture, no post-career build.
Entertainment-crossover deals, speaking circuits, media placements. WME positions athletes as entertainment talent — a real strategic differentiator. But the underlying business model is still commission on placements. No fan membership economies. No owned IP platforms. No structure that compounds.
Revenue maximization through contracts plus endorsements. Goldman Sachs invested at ~$1B because Excel positions clients as “individual brands and arbiters of pop culture.” That framing is real. The gap is they do not build owned product businesses or recurring fan revenue — they negotiate better deals because of stronger brand narrative.
A contract-optimization firm. Strong on rookie negotiations and second-contract extensions. The entire model is fee on contract value. No owned revenue infrastructure. No platform building. No post-career architecture.
Music and entertainment crossover plus premium brand positioning. Roc Nation pairs athletes with luxury, fashion, and culture brands at the highest tier. The cultural-capital angle is genuine differentiation. The gap is still infrastructure: no fan-membership model, no athlete-owned product systems, no recurring revenue architecture.
The firms built specifically for boxing and MMA. They understand fight contracts, matchmaking politics, and combat-sport sponsorship cycles. None of them build owned revenue infrastructure for the fighter. The math is identical to the major agencies — the fighter earns during the career, nothing earns after.
Fight negotiation and brand-deal placement. Stable of UFC and PFL fighters across multiple weight classes. The model: manage the fighter, negotiate purses, secure walkout sponsors. No owned revenue infrastructure for the fighter. No fan-direct community. No post-career platform.
The biggest pure-MMA management shop. Roster includes some of the highest-profile fighters in the sport. UFC negotiation specialists — they know exactly which buttons to push to land a title shot or a Performance of the Night bonus. They do not build athlete platforms, owned IP, or post-career revenue systems.
High-end combat-sports management with lifestyle-brand positioning. They pair fighters with premium consumer brands — watches, apparel, fragrance. The sponsorship work is sophisticated. The gap is the same: no fan-direct revenue model, no athlete-owned product lines, no recurring membership economy.
A west-coast boxing promoter with a developmental roster. Builds prospects through the regional circuit and graduates them to bigger cards. The model is purse-and-undercard-fee, not athlete equity. No owned revenue for the fighter outside fight night.
Mid-tier and legacy boxing promoters — event-focused, not athlete-IP focused. Build cards, sell tickets, sell undercard sponsorships. The fighter is a contracted line item on a P&L the promoter owns. Nothing in the model is designed to build athlete-owned anything.
Promoters are the most structurally opposed to what CNL builds. Their model depends on owning the media rights, the audience relationship, and the event IP. The fighter is a contracted performer — not an equity partner, not an owner of the audience. This is the category where the gap is the loudest.
The largest combat-sports promoter in the world. Fighter pay is fixed by contract — the well-documented industry average is roughly 16-20% of revenue to athletes, vs ~50% in the NFL or NBA. Zero owned revenue flows to the athlete outside the contract. UFC controls media rights, sponsorship inventory (Venum, Monster), and audience relationship entirely.
Challenger MMA promotions running tournament and league formats. PFL has innovated on the structure side — Francis Ngannou received equity and a board advisory role at signing, the first time a major promoter gave a fighter actual ownership in the organization. Even with that, the underlying model is still promoter-keeps-media, fighter-is-contracted.
The largest MMA promotion in Asia. Same structural model: athlete is contracted, media and audience are the promoter’s. ONE has built genuine regional dominance, but the fighter participates as an employee, not an owner.
Bare-knuckle promotion with a fast-growing audience and a real PPV model. The structural reality is identical to every other promoter: BKFC owns the media and the event IP, fighters receive contracted purses.
These platforms enable direct-fan revenue — the closest category to one of CNL’s five build pieces. The critical distinction: a platform you plug into is rented infrastructure. The platform owns the relationship, the data, the payment rails. CNL builds infrastructure the athlete owns. Platform = you rent the audience. CNL = you own it.
Built specifically for athletes and celebrities. Ticketed communities, direct fan revenue, paid messaging tiers. This is the closest market-available product to CNL’s inner-circle membership concept. The structural difference is fundamental: TopFan is a platform the athlete plugs into. CNL builds the infrastructure the athlete owns. On a platform you rent the relationship; if the platform pivots, raises take rates, or shuts down, the athlete loses the asset. CNL-built infrastructure persists as the athlete’s property — data, audience, brand, payment flows.
The original creator-subscription platform. Works well for content creators with consistent output cadence. Not optimized for athletes — the format assumes regular posted content, not training cycles plus event windows. Platform takes 8-12% before payment processing. Athletes are not the target persona.
Transactional video greetings. Athletes earn per request. Effective for incremental income, not for building anything that compounds. No community, no recurring revenue, no relationship-building architecture.
Direct subscription with the highest revenue-share in the category. Reputational risk for athletes given the platform’s primary content category. Possible for some, off-table for most. No community-architecture features — it is a subscription pipe, not a relationship platform.
Subscription newsletter publishing. The format is wrong for most athletes — long-form writing is not how fight-sport audiences engage with their fighters. Works for the rare athlete-writer. Not a fit for the broader roster.
Live-streaming platform dominated by gaming content. Poor fit for combat sports — the streaming cadence does not match training schedules, and the audience composition skews away from the fight-sport viewer. Some crossover works (gaming-friendly fighters), but it is not the core model.
The licensing and IP-management category is where the biggest athlete-asset numbers in the industry live. The model is either acquisition (buy IP at exit) or one-off building for a top-0.01% individual. Neither model builds the infrastructure for athletes who are not yet at the very top.
Acquires and licenses celebrity and athlete IP at the back end of careers and post-mortem. Manages the Muhammad Ali, Shaquille O’Neal, and Elvis estates. $10B+ in annual retail across the portfolio. The model is acquisition: they buy the IP, they do not build it with the athlete. By the time ABG is involved, the build is done.
The proof that CNL’s thesis works at scale. LeBron built exactly what CNL builds — owned media (Uninterrupted), owned products, owned production infrastructure. $725M valuation. The Shop on HBO. Space Jam produced by the athlete’s own company. This is the model at full scale. The gap is access: SpringHill was built by LeBron, for LeBron. It is not a service any other athlete can buy. The 99.9% of athletes who are not LeBron James have no one building this for them. That is exactly the lane CNL fills.
The dominant athlete-merchandise platform. Revenue share to athletes on licensed merch. Massive distribution and operational scale. The structural reality: the athlete licenses their name; Fanatics owns the operational infrastructure. No ownership architecture — it is a royalty stream on someone else’s platform.
Premium venue hospitality, VIP fan experiences, ticketing. Works with leagues, teams, and venues. Not an athlete-owned model — the athlete is a draw, not an owner. No infrastructure flows to the athlete from the Legends model.
The data layer of the industry — valuation engines, sponsorship-matching marketplaces, performance-and-market intelligence. Useful tools. None of them build owned revenue infrastructure for the athlete. They optimize the deal-flow side of the existing model.
A data tool: athlete valuation modeling, sponsorship-matching algorithms, brand-fit scoring. The output is better intel for the existing deal-flow model. No owned revenue layer. Not infrastructure for the athlete.
The dominant NIL marketplace for college athletes. Sponsorship matching, compliance handling, payment processing. Genuinely good infrastructure for the NIL-deal flow specifically. The model is platform-fee on NIL deals — not owned-revenue building for the athlete.
Sports-business newsletter and media operation. Not an athlete tool — it is an industry-intel publication. Useful context. Not infrastructure.
Sports data, statistics, and betting-integrity services. Sells to leagues, broadcasters, and sportsbooks. Not athlete-facing. Not in the athlete-revenue conversation.
The post-career and player-association category. Important work — collective bargaining, group licensing, mental-health and transition support. None of it is individual-athlete monetization infrastructure. CNL builds the individual asset; this category handles collective and transitional services.
A new league model with equity allocation to athletes. Genuinely interesting and structurally different from traditional leagues. League-specific — the model lives inside the Athletes Unlimited league system, not as a portable infrastructure layer for athletes outside it.
Collective bargaining and group licensing. Critical work for the collective: minimum salaries, health benefits, group merchandise revenue. By design, this is collective, not individual. Group licensing distributes royalties broadly across the membership.
Wellness and transition services for retired athletes — mental-health, financial-literacy, career-coaching support. Important and underfunded category. Not revenue architecture.
The Capability Map — 8 columns, 30+ players
Every player from every category above, scored across the eight capabilities that matter in athlete monetization. The five ★ columns on the right are CNL’s lane. They are empty across the entire industry.
✓✓ Exceptional ✓ Does this ~ Partially — Does not ✓* When opportunity presents ★ CNL unique gap LK Lionel’s room
The Closest Comparison
Most players on this page are not close. These five get one or two things right. None of them built the full system. None of them built it for the fighters who are not already superstars.
Co-invested in Proper No. Twelve with McGregor in 2018. Majority stake sold in 2021 for $600M — McGregor personally earned ~$125M. This is the closest any management firm has come to building genuine owned equity infrastructure for a fighter. One manager said: this is not a deal fee, this is a business I own with my client.
One deal. One client. Not a system. No other Paradigm client has a Proper No. Twelve. It took the most commercially potent fighter in MMA history to make it happen. CNL builds this infrastructure for every client at every level — not once for McGregor and never again.
LeBron built exactly what CNL builds — owned media (Uninterrupted), owned products, owned production infrastructure. $725M valuation. The Shop on HBO. Space Jam produced by the athlete’s own company. This is the model at full scale. It is proof that the infrastructure CNL builds is worth building.
You need to be LeBron James. SpringHill was built by LeBron, for LeBron. It is not a service any other athlete can access. The 99.9% of athletes who are not LeBron have no one building this for them. That is the exact gap CNL fills.
PFL gave Francis Ngannou equity and a board advisory role when he signed — the first time a major MMA promoter gave a fighter actual ownership in the organization. Jake Paul got a 50/50 PPV split. These are genuinely different deal structures from anything the UFC has ever offered.
This is equity in the promotion. Not in a business the fighter owns independently. If PFL is sold or restructured, that equity changes. CNL builds businesses the athlete owns outright — products, communities, and platforms that exist regardless of what any promoter does next.
Rich Paul partnered with New Balance to create Klutch Athletics — a joint venture where the agency itself holds equity in a brand. That is structurally different from earning a commission on a sponsorship deal. It is an agent saying: I don’t just want to be paid for this deal, I want to own part of what we build.
Klutch Athletics is equity for the agency — not equity for the athlete. It is one brand partnership framed as an equity JV. CNL builds the athlete’s owned infrastructure, not the agency’s balance sheet. And it is built systematically, not once for the agent’s most famous client.
Goldman Sachs invested at ~$1B because Excel explicitly positions clients as “individual brands and arbiters of pop culture.” That framing matters. Caitlin Clark’s $100M+ commercial explosion was partly an Excel-built brand strategy, not just a contract negotiation. Goldman does not invest $1B in a commission shop.
Excel builds the brand narrative and negotiates better deals because of it. They do not build owned revenue infrastructure. Caitlin Clark’s brand is built. Her owned product business, her inner circle economy, her post-career architecture — none of that is being built by Excel. That is still the gap.
The Gap — 36 Players, Same Answer Every Time
Not a deal. Not a commission. A real business — products, communities, platforms — where the athlete holds equity and earns permanently. Boras closes $700M in contracts. The client earns. The career ends. Then there is nothing that earns independently. That is the gap.
The most loyal segment of every athlete’s audience will pay for proximity. No promoter, no agency, no manager builds this. It earns between events and after the career ends. It compounds. Every player on this page leaves it untouched.
Paradigm did it once — Proper No. Twelve — and sold for $600M. Agents collect 10–15% of fight contracts while that same fighter’s brand could build a product worth 100x the purse. The infrastructure to build it systematically does not exist in any agency, promoter, or management firm.
Podcast. Content. Coaching. Speaking. The commercial stack built on who an athlete is, not just what they win. LeBron built SpringHill to do this for himself. ABG acquires it at exit. Everyone in the middle — the 99.9% who are not LeBron — has no one building this for them.
Every player on this page manages the career. None of them build the structure that outlasts it. Retirement does not end the commercial opportunity. It begins it — if the infrastructure was built while the career was active. It was not built. That is the gap CNL fills.
The CNL Lane
CNL does not negotiate contracts. CNL does not promote fights. CNL does not manage careers. CNL does not sell sponsorships on behalf of brands. CNL does not manage IP for retired athletes.
CNL builds the five things every player on this page leaves unbuilt. And because CNL never enters their lane, every single one of them is a potential CNL partner or distribution channel.
“Boras closes $1B in contracts in a week. Rosenhaus closes a $120M extension. Klutch closes $900M in a single summer. The athlete earns. The career ends. Then there is nothing that earns independently. CNL builds what earns after the last cheque.”
The CNL Principle
Plain Language Summary
Every player on this page helps an athlete earn during their career. CNL builds the infrastructure that earns after it.
Products they own. Communities that pay monthly. Platforms that compound. That is CNL. The five ★ columns on this page are the only place CNL exists — and they are empty across 36 players, 8 categories, and every level of the industry.
Every agency, every promoter, every manager on this page is a door CNL can walk through. The lane is open. The infrastructure does not exist anywhere else.
Start The ConversationCNL Market Intelligence · 2026